Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-03-25 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-03-25 House Journal Page 3316 HB 465 The following, which had been moved down the calendar to follow HB517 (page 3310), was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 465 An Act relating to employment of teachers and school administrators and to public school collective bargaining. with the: Journal Page HES RPT CS(HES) 2DP 2NR 2AM 3212 ZERO FISCAL NOTE (DOE) 3213 Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 465(HES) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. 1996-03-25 House Journal Page 3317 HB 465 Representative Vezey placed a call of the House on the bill. The call was satisfied. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Ivan: Page 6, line 22, following or: Delete the teacher can show evidence of acceptable teaching experience in the subject Insert the teacher has received an evaluation of acceptable or better in the subject or subjects Page 6, line 26, following or: Delete the teacher can show evidence of acceptable teaching experience in the subject Insert the teacher has received an evaluation of acceptable or better in the subject or subjects Representative Ivan moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Kubina objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 465(HES) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 37 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brown, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Long, Mackie, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Nays: Brice, Kubina, Navarre 1996-03-25 House Journal Page 3318 HB 465 And so, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Ivan: Page 3, line 13, following certificate: Insert or is a site administrator Representative Ivan moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Robinson objected. Amendment to Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Davies: Following site administrator: Insert under the supervision of a person with a Type B certificate Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that the amendment to Amendment No. 2 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 2 as amended be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 465(HES) am Second Reading Amendment No. 2 as amended YEAS: 24 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams 1996-03-25 House Journal Page 3319 HB 465 Nays: Barnes, Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Sanders, Willis And so, Amendment No. 2 as amended was adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representatives Martin and Ivan: Page 4, line 17, following a: Delete regular classroom teacher Insert certificated teacher Representative Martin moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Objection was heard and withdrawn. There being no further objection, Amendment No. 3 was adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representatives Martin and Ivan: Page 5, line 22, following MANNERß;: Insert or Page 5, line 23, following (2): Delete immorality, which is defined as the commission of an act that, under the laws of the state, constitutes a crime involving moral turpitude; or (3) substantial Insert ªIMMORALITY, WHICH IS DEFINED AS THE COMMISSION OF AN ACT THAT, UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE, CONSTITUTES A CRIME INVOLVING MORAL TURPITUDE; (3) SUBSTANTIALß Representative Martin moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. 1996-03-25 House Journal Page 3320 HB 465 Representative Kubina objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 465(HES) am Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 29 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Green, Hanley, Ivan, Kohring, Martin, Moses, Phillips, Sanders, Toohey Nays: Brice, Brown, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Grussendorf, James, Kelly, Kott, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Masek, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Therriault, Vezey, Williams, Willis And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative Robinson: Page 2, line 15, through page 4, line 11: Delete all material and insert: "Sec. 14.20.149. NEGOTIATED EVALUATION SYSTEM. A school board shall bargain with the employee bargaining organization representing its certificated employees to establish an evaluation system for those employees. The system must include professional performance standards and must provide a method for adopting and implementing a plan of improvement to develop the competency of a teacher whose performance is less than acceptable." Representative Robinson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Representative Ivan objected. The Speaker stated that, without objection, Amendment No. 5 would be held until a later time. 1996-03-25 House Journal Page 3321 HB 465 Amendment No. 6 was offered by Representatives Mulder and Ivan: Page 7, line 6: Delete inconsistent Insert in conflict Representative Ivan moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. Objection was heard and withdrawn. There being no further objection, Amendment No. 6 was adopted. The call was lifted.